Narvar Vs. ReturnLogic

Trusted by 450+ global brands

A Quick Comparison Between Narvar and ReturnLogic, and How ClickPost Compare to Both

Returns Automation & Conversion Flow	Automates return approval, triggers refunds, supports repeat purchases, and speeds up exchange flows	1	2	1
Incentivized Exchange Strategies	Drives store credit adoption, triggers bonus refunds, and uses reason-based nudges for exchanges	2	2	1
Brand-First Post-Purchase Flows	Builds affinity through segmented policies, styling guides, and personalized delivery notifications	1	2	1
Flexible Exchange Configuration	Multiple variant swaps, bonus credits, custom catalogs, partial exchange & return logic	2	2	1
Full Catalog Exchange	Custom catalog exchange rules with automated refund variance and flexible refund mediums	3	1	1
Exchange Fulfillment Control	Adds ‘hold’ tags to exchange orders, reserves stock, auto-releases stock	1	2	1
Milestone-Based Refund Engine	Tracking-based refund engine, support for store credit, gift card, manual overrides, auto-retry	2	2	1
Return Intelligence Dashboard	Breaks down return causes, return volume, refund logs, post-purchase data, exportable reports	1	1	1
Branded AI Email Engine	Personalized emails by geography, shipment status; subject line generation, brand tone & theme alignment	1	3	1
Return Abuse Mitigation Rules	Enforces return limits, blocks repeat offenders, and flags risky orders using AI pattern detection	1	2	2
Centralized Return Status Sync	Tracks return status in real time, syncs order data, API+webhook, unifies hub-level insights	1	2	1
Omnichannel Alert System	Delivers channel-specific notifications using branded templates across 50+ post-purchase events	2	2	1
SKU-Based Return Configuration	Builds structured return policies using multi-level reason codes, SKU mapping, and QC filters	2	2	1
Variant & Multi-Item Exchange Logic	Enables variant replacement with stock validation, fallback swaps, and multi-product exchange support	1	2	1
Return-Compatible Discount Logic	Supports Shopify promos, processes discount codes and bundles, aligns exchange & refund rules	2	3	1
Support-Led Return Switching	Enables support teams to convert return requests into exchanges during resolution conversations	3	3	1
Dynamic Return Period Configuration	Assigns return/exchange periods by product, category, or order type to ensure flexibility	2	1	1
Reverse Carrier Integration & Label Generation	Integrates reverse carriers in 1 day with printed and QR-based return label generation	3	1	1
Enterprise Integration Ecosystem	550+ carrier, WMS, ERP, storefronts & marketplaces, OMS, marketing tools, payment & communication gateways	2	1	1
Reason-Based Return Charges	Applies return charges per item or reason, deducted automatically from refund at resolution	2	3	1

** Instructions:

Column 1: Name of the Feature
Column 2: Description of the feature
Column 3: Brand 1 details
Column 4: Brand 2 details
Column 5: Brand 3 details

Note: Column 3, 4 and 5 will accept value only "1" or "2" or "3". Column 5 will be there if there two external brands are considered. Otherwise Column 3 will be "Other" and Column 4 will be "Clickpost".

1 -> Advanced

2 -> Intermediate

3 -> Limited

	Narvar	ReturnLogic	ClickPost

Narvar

ReturnLogic

ClickPost

Who is the Best Fit For Your Business?

ClickPost for Fast-Scaling Brands Prioritizing ROI and Exchange-Led Retention

Narvar and ReturnLogic are established players in returns optimization. Narvar’s IRIS engine leverages customer data to minimize fraud and refine return eligibility, making it ideal for large enterprises focused on revenue protection against wardrobing and similar practices. ReturnLogic emphasizes speed and convenience, automating return approvals, label generation, and offering strong support for enforcing policies and managing refunds.

Both platforms enhance the post-purchase experience through data-driven personalization and automation, but ClickPost brings the best of both worlds. It combines advanced automation with configurable manual controls. ClickPost enforces granular, brand-specific return rules, supports AI-driven customer segmentation, and allows teams to override refunds or switch returns to exchanges when needed.

Though Narvar offers variant exchange controls, ClickPost delivers a complete exchange-first framework that supports both full catalog and custom variant replacements with automatic price reconciliation. This drives 54% return-to-exchange conversions and retains 40% of refund value as store credit or gift cards.

Similarly, ReturnLogic shines in RMA automation and warranty claim flows, but ClickPost matches that efficiency with added operational flexibility. For instance, routing return shipments by rule, configuring return windows and charges, and layering manual override options for premium workflows.

In short, all three platforms offer distinct value in return optimization. But for fast-scaling eCommerce brands seeking post-purchase clarity, operational agility, and measurable retention impact—ClickPost offers a focused, ROI-led alternative that doesn’t overwhelm teams with complexity.

Get a Demo

Frequently asked questions (FAQ's)

How do ReturnLogic, Narvar, and ClickPost compare in automating returns workflows and minimizing manual effort?

ReturnLogic and Narvar automate policy setup, label generation, and refund workflows. However, ClickPost adds deeper layers involving dynamic return-to-exchange switching, milestone-triggered refunds with auto-retries, return routing, and multichannel alerts, site-wide exchange with automatic price reconciliation. It reduces manual intervention while giving support teams real-time override and operational flexibility.

Which platform offers the broadest compatibility with existing e-commerce and backend systems—ReturnLogic, Narvar, or ClickPost?

ClickPost offers unmatched extensibility with 550+ carrier APIs, 30+ storefronts including native compatibility with Shopify, 8+ WMS and ERPs, 40+ communication channels, as well as custom integrations in 2–8 weeks. In contrast, Narvar and ReturnLogic support limited storefronts, ERPs, and logistics tools but with narrower scope and slower custom deployment, making ClickPost more agile for scaling infrastructure.

What are the key differences in returns policy configurability between ReturnLogic, Narvar, and ClickPost?

Narvar supports segmented return logic and SKU-based eligibility, while ReturnLogic allows rule-based return approvals, including flat return fees. ClickPost offers deeper configurability—custom windows by SKU or order type, reason-based fees, item-level triggers, and refund deduction logic—enabling brands to create precise return frameworks without rigid defaults.

How do ReturnLogic, Narvar, and ClickPost differ in reporting and analytics capabilities focused on returns?

ReturnLogic provides actionable return volume reports and logs but lacks real-time dashboard granularity. Narvar offers high-level insights tied to fraud detection and delivery accuracy. ClickPost gives centralized visibility with exportable return reports, refund logs, and return volume breakdowns by reason, or item—providing operational clarity and policy refinement.

Which solution scales its pricing best with growing return volumes: ReturnLogic, Narvar, or ClickPost?

Narvar typically caters to large enterprise clients with fixed-tier contracts. ReturnLogic offers modular pricing for DTC brands but can become cost-intensive as volume increases. ClickPost scales flexibly with usage-based models that support fast-growing brands—helping optimize return costs without locking into rigid enterprise pricing structures.

Trusted by 450+ global brands

A Quick Comparison Between Narvar and ReturnLogic, and How ClickPost Compare to Both

Who is the Best Fit For Your Business?

Streamline your shipping experience with ClickPost