Aftership Vs. Easyship

The key to success in multi-carrier shipping lies in scalable infrastructure and deep feature customizations—especially for enterprise operations. While Easyship, AfterShip, and ClickPost all demonstrate robust capabilities, their strengths vary across use cases.

Easyship focuses on cost savings and global carrier access. It simplifies rate shopping, batch shipping, address validation, and offers pre-filled customs documentation—great for D2C brands or cross-border sellers with a mid-range order volume. However, its automation is more shipping rate-based than performance-driven. ClickPost’s automation focuses operational efficiency through SLA monitoring or failed delivery resolution, which does not fall under Easyships wings. 

AfterShip, on the other hand, shines in branded post-purchase experiences. With elegant tracking pages and timely notifications, it's ideal for businesses prioritizing CX design over deep logistics intelligence. Therefore, when it comes to granular returns automation, carrier-performance driven recommendation or invoice reconciliation, its feature depth does not include these.

In contrast to both, ClickPost bridges the gap between scalable automated shipping and post-purchase intelligence with layered configurations and personalized omnichannel touchpoints, ideal for enterprises. It offers brands the ability to control carrier selection, have real-time SLA monitoring, send automated alerts covering all key shipping and return events. 

From proactive hub-level shipment visibility to SKU-specific return policies, ClickPost ensures faster go-live timelines and reduced operational costs—improving ROI while aligning with scale-heavy fulfillment needs. For fast-growing enterprises looking beyond standard tracking and rate-shopping, toward performance-led delivery and optimized returns, ClickPost showcases 56% less WISMO calls, 30% less shipping rated costs, and meets 93% of customer’s delivery expectations.